top of page
Blog Posts.jpg

How The New York Times article "The Constitution is Sacred. Is it also Dangerous?" is a prime example of left leaning media bias





The New York Times article titled "The Constitution is Sacred. Is it also Dangerous?" can be seen as an example of left-leaning media bias due to its framing, selection of sources, and overall narrative. The article critiques the U.S. Constitution by suggesting that it has become a barrier to true democratic governance and even implies that it might be dangerous in the modern context. This perspective aligns with a broader progressive argument that some constitutional mechanisms, like the Electoral College and the lifetime appointment of Supreme Court justices, are outdated and undemocratic.


Critics of the article argue that it reflects a left-leaning bias because it predominantly highlights viewpoints that question or criticize the Constitution, often linking its perceived flaws to current right-wing political successes. The article also references scholars and authors who propose radical changes to the Constitution or even suggest its abolition, which aligns with progressive critiques of the Constitution as a tool that reinforces minority rule and systemic inequities. Furthermore, the article’s focus on issues like the role of white men in drafting the Constitution and its connections to slavery can be seen as reinforcing a narrative that the Constitution is inherently flawed, a viewpoint more commonly associated with progressive or left-leaning ideologies.


These elements contribute to the perception that the article is biased, as it gives significant weight to critiques of the Constitution without equally presenting counterarguments that defend its relevance and adaptability in modern times. This kind of framing is often cited as evidence of the New York Times' left-leaning bias in its coverage of foundational American institutions​.


To offer a more balanced view of the Constitution's relevance today, it's essential to include counterarguments that defend its enduring value and adaptability.

The Constitution as a Living Document

  • Adaptability through Amendments: The Constitution was designed to be amended, which allows it to adapt to changing societal norms and values. For example, amendments like the 13th, 14th, and 15th abolished slavery, granted citizenship rights, and protected voting rights regardless of race. The 19th Amendment, which granted women the right to vote, further demonstrates the Constitution's ability to evolve. Critics argue that the process of amendment is too difficult, but defenders maintain that this ensures changes are well-considered and reflect broad consensus, thus preserving stability.


  • Judicial Interpretation: The Constitution’s broad language has allowed the judiciary to interpret it in ways that address contemporary issues. The Supreme Court's rulings on issues ranging from civil rights to digital privacy show that the Constitution can address modern challenges without needing constant amendments. For example, the Court has used the Constitution to uphold rights in cases like Obergefell v. Hodges (same-sex marriage) and Riley v. California (digital privacy), showcasing its adaptability​.

Checks and Balances

  • Preventing Tyranny: The Constitution’s system of checks and balances is designed to prevent any one branch of government from becoming too powerful. This system has withstood the test of time and has been crucial in maintaining the United States' democratic system. Despite criticisms that the system can lead to gridlock, supporters argue that it is better to have a slow, deliberate process than to rush changes that could lead to abuses of power​.


  • Federalism: The division of powers between federal and state governments allows for a balance that accommodates a diverse nation. While some criticize this system for creating disparities between states, defenders argue that federalism enables states to serve as "laboratories of democracy," experimenting with policies that, if successful, can be adopted at the national level​.


3. Protection of Minority Rights

  • Bill of Rights: The first ten amendments, known as the Bill of Rights, are a testament to the Constitution’s role in protecting individual liberties against government overreach. The First Amendment, for example, guarantees freedom of speech, religion, and the press, which are foundational to a functioning democracy. These protections have been essential in safeguarding minority opinions and ensuring that dissenting voices can be heard.


  • Counter-majoritarian Institutions: Institutions like the Senate and the Electoral College are often criticized as undemocratic, but their purpose is to protect smaller states and minority interests from being overwhelmed by the majority. Defenders argue that this system prevents "tyranny of the majority" and ensures that all regions of the country have a voice in the federal government. The Senate, for instance, ensures that less populous states are not dominated by the interests of more populous ones, preserving the federal nature of the union​.


4. Global Influence

  • Inspiration for Democracies Worldwide: The U.S. Constitution has served as a model for other nations building their own democratic systems. Its principles of separation of powers, federalism, and individual rights have been widely adopted and adapted by countries around the world. This global influence underscores the Constitution’s relevance and success as a framework for governance​ as a Constitutional Republic.


5. The Constitution’s Endurance

  • Stability and Longevity: The U.S. Constitution is one of the oldest continuously operating written constitutions in the world. Its endurance is often cited as evidence of its success in providing a stable foundation for governance. While some argue for more frequent updates, the Constitution’s longevity suggests it has been effective in guiding the nation since 1787 through a wide range of challenges over the centuries.


Incorporating these counterarguments into discussions about the Constitution highlights its enduring value and relevance, even as it faces criticism. This balanced approach would acknowledge legitimate concerns while also recognizing the strengths and successes of the Constitution in maintaining a stable and adaptable democratic system. Join with The 917 Society as we prepare to honor Constitution Day on September 17th across our classrooms in America. Let us celebrate the U.S. Constitution as the safeguard of our liberties and freedoms and the enduring legacy of the United States of America as we continue our pursuit of a "more perfect union."


107 views0 comments

Comments


  • instagram-xl
  • facebook-3-xl
  • twitter-3-xl
  • youtube-xl
  • telegram-xl
bottom of page